Still always check the sources. One of the most useful thinks to know. Is the source trustworthy or not, where does the image come from…
You must log in or register to comment.
This advice will be useless soon.
deleted by creator
I’ll believe it when it’s actually released. The press release images probably cherry picked the best images out of who know how many iterations.
Yes, it is definitely giving me the uncanny vibes: looking at his white cap, seemingly made of the same plastic as that funny coat.
But all in all, the article is quite meaningless. Can’t do much with these ‘tips’.
Also the shadows don’t make sense. The lighting is shining directly on the subject as though it was taken in a studio, but the photo appears to be taken outdoors
This was also generated nearly six months ago (more?). Between SDXL, the newer midjourney versions and DallE 3, this articles shelf life is practically nonexistent
The links in the article were interesting, the actual tips were pretty average
A lot of it was just common sense. The irony is that article maybe AI generated itself.
Disappointed article did not provide a high res, uncropped version of the Pope in a puffy coat.
First thing you look at: the hands.
(photo does not show hands)
The generative ai have been enhanced with more training on the hands. They hot much better.
They did link to it though.
uhh… lets put it this way. it took humans how long to generate generative ai? how long do you think it will take to perfect it? im guessing a lot less time.
We keep doing what we keep doing.
Similar to not believing one side of a news story, look at all sides, then decide.
-
AI Photo Tip 1 — Body Parts
-
AI Photo Tip 2 — Garbled Text
-
AI Photo Tip 3 — Take a beat, consider the source
-
Other Miscellaneous AI Photo Tips
You’ll also want to look for weird inconsistencies like mismatched earrings or warped asymmetrical faces, says How To Geek.
-
