We asked professionals if they wanted Apple’s desktop, and they all said no.
The MacBook Pro is the best laptop I’ve ever owned. It is extremely powerful, hugely energy-efficient, and the mechanical keyboard is finally really nice.
Since the MBP entirely scratches my business itch, the only desktop I’d buy is a gaming rig, which the Mac Pro certainly is not.
Mechanical keyboard?
I guess not mechanical keyboard… maybe I meant butterfly keyboard.
“Butterfly” was the design introduced with the touchbar MacBook pro. They’ve gone back to the scissor switches they were using before (with some modifications).
I don’t think you meant that. The butterfly keyboards were pretty much univerally hated and Apple doesn’t use them anymore.
Macs just have a pretty good scissor switch keyboard.
Any Apple is the worst laptop you can buy and will be basically useless in short order considering they’re completely unupgradeable and irreparable.
Blows my mind that so many people still buy Apple’s garbage. They crap in your mouth and then their consumers just keep showing up to beg for more.
Switched from a shitty dell to my Macbook pro laptop when I transitioned to the RHEL side of the house in my company.
Been using it ever since and I will never go back. But yea… I have no idea what the hell i’d ever want a Mac Pro for.
Maybe try music production professionals, a lot of them tend to use Macs
They’d want a Mac Studio. In fact, that product was designed specifically for music production professionals and outperforms the Pro.
The only people the Pro targets are those who want expansion capabilities, and the latest version is hamstrung in this regard.
I dont really think that music production is performance limited though
For projects with a huge number of tracks, VSTs, etc, you can push hardware to the limit quicker than you might think.
So I was confused at first, until I realized the headline said “Mac Pro”, not “Macbook Pro”.
Plenty of professionals use MacBooks, Mac Minis, and even Mac Studios.
The question is, who wants the new Mac Pro? The vast majority of professionals are better suited by a laptop, or can get all the same work done with a Mac Studio.
Apple hasn’t been for professionals, for like a decade now.
MacBooks are super popular in a variety of professional fields. They are still the go-to machines for photography and video editing. They are popular in software development for providing a good UNIX environment out of the box while also being very solidly built machines.
The more my software engineering career matures, the more I see my peers using MacBooks.
Windows still absolutely dominates government and enterprise, but the idea that professionals don’t use Macs is pretty nonsensical. It’s the kind of thing I believed when I was 20 and working in tech support, back when I still thought it was cool to call Apple users “sheep”.
I think Apple is going to lose that edge with developers as WSL and its ecosystem keep improving. There’s no Apple servers, so a lot of that code they’re writing runs on Linux, but Macs only look like Linux. They actually work differently, and you have to use homebrew and a lot of tools are different. But I can load up just about any distro with WSL, so all the packages install the same. Add on top of that the difficulty of making Mac work with AD and having a different version of Microsoft Office. Plus their licensing terms for virtualization are terrible, and they don’t make multi-session servers anymore, so developing IOS apps usually means you have a small fleet of Mac Minis instead of some nice enterprise hardware.
I thought this too until every Windows patch started turning my computer into an ad machine.
WSLn is nice but using a Windows 11 machine is starting to suck big time.
I think Linux for M-series chips will be viable before WSL is.
The actual hardware combination of build quality, performance, and battery life still blows the rest of the market out of the water, and even if it weren’t perfectly competitive with actually comparable windows machines, professional users are much less price sensitive than general consumers.
I think Apple is going to lose that edge with developers as WSL and its ecosystem keep improving. There’s no Apple servers, so a lot of that code they’re writing runs on Linux, but Macs only look like Linux. They actually work differently, and you have to use homebrew and a lot of tools are different. But I can load up just about any distro with WSL, so all the packages install the same. Add on top of that the difficulty of making Mac work with AD and having a different version of Microsoft Office. Plus their licensing terms for virtualization are terrible, and they don’t make multi-session servers anymore, so developing IOS apps usually means you have a small fleet of Mac Minis instead of some nice enterprise hardware.
This. Good enterprises offer both options. I think people are starting to realize that its best to let people pick the tool that works best for them in this circumstance. Also, equivalent Dells (I have mainly worked at Dell shops lately) are actually more expensive than a MacBook Pro.
Another thing is that enterprise tools lock down Macs a lot less in my experience. This usually pushes people in the direction of Mac when you don’t have to go through an approval process to install an app or package you want to test.
Disagree.
All the software companies i work with has switched to MacBook Pros as their mainline professional laptop of choice in the past decade.
It’s literally a better product for most of developer work and much easier to support.
In fact, I’m confident that MX MacBook Pros have cannibalized a good chunk of Mac Pro sales because they are just that good.
Well, I’ve worked for the government (as contractor), corporations, and small businesses, I could count a few times I’ve seen people using Apple Mac Pro devices on one hand (more often seeing Macbook Pro rather, but very rarely for development) and more time than I can count on either Linux or Windows workstation computers.
We use Linux desktop often, because most of our servers are running on Linux so it helps to have version conformity when matching up with server’s versioning and we occasionally use Windows for Visual Studio, proprietary software and so forth. But there are a few times where we get discounts for buying software for Linux rather than Windows.
Employees in my office switched from Apple Macbook Pro to Windows/Linux based laptops like Framework Laptop, because Macbook Pro often time lacked GPU that you would find on Linux and Windows workstation. Apple is going off on it’s own little world with their own Metal API/GPU and it doesn’t reflect the reality in real world emerging technologies. For instance, there are some computational challenges that in my office, we make use of Vulkan Compute so that we can purchase both Nvidia GPU and AMD GPU to generate real-time data, had we used Metal API and Apple’s products, it would’ve been cheaper to purchase cloud compute servers. (We wanted to ensure each developer can test the given Vulkan code on their own desktop/workstation.)
My experience has been all GPU-intensive workflows have been pushed to the cloud. It works a lot better for CI/CD purposes as well, and most of the larger datasets are too practically large for your laptop, it ends up being prohibitively slow to download datasets from databases to your own laptop and then train on your local machine.
I could be biased since most of my network is in the startup scene in SV, where hardware cost is generally the LAST thing most companies worry about. I haven’t seen a non-mac software company that’s not a 5000+ dinosaur person company.
deleted by creator
Yeah, and I am honestly surprised that you could do ok for AI on Mac since I was pretty sure that Tensorflow/Pytorch are pretty much CUDA implementation primarily and only have recently worked on branching out to other API.
What? I’m a software engineer (a so-called “professional”) at a major corporation and we get the choice between Windows and Mac. Every single person I know in the company has chosen Mac.
This is always weird to me. Running containers on my Linux machine is way faster than all of my coworkers on Windows. But they still are able to run containers way faster than our coworkers on Apple.
I don’t see the appeal of an apple machine for coding unless you’re making Apple specific software. To each their own though.
I’m a heavy containers user. All the code I write is deployed on Linux. Regularly have a dozen or more running.
Performance is a mixed bag in my expereince. Some software is slower, but other software is faster on my Mac. The RAM on a good modern Mac (even laptops) runs at almost a terabyte per second, and the SSD runs at several gigabytes per second. That’s a lot faster than most Linux boxes and it’s often more than enough to overcome inefficencies like converting from one filesystem to another.
I’ve tried using a headless Linux server for my containers, and cloud Linux servers… but it generally hasn’t made a much of a difference and just adds unnecessary complexity.
As for why I like a Mac… the window manager is just so much better especially when you customise it with third party utilities. Also, I like how tightly integrated all my Apple devices are. My desktop Mac, my laptop, my iPad, my iPhone… they all work togerther seamlessly with a single keyboard/mouse, a single pair of wireless headphones, a single copy/paste clipboard, all the same files on my desktop/documents/etc.
They even integrate with my watch - when I SSH into a server on my Mac, it checks if my watch is nearby, checks if I’m wearing it (if you steal my watch, it auto locks), then offers for me to tap a button on the watch to unlock my SSH private key. When I’m wearing my motorbike helmet and try to use my phone… it can’t scan my face and instead falls back to useing my watch to unlock the phone.
The performance and battery life of my ultraportable laptop is also pretty awesome. I keep it plugged in (to a monitor) on my desk most of the time, but on the weekend I can use it all weekend without charging the battery and it’s actually got exactly the same CPU/RAM/performance/etc as my desktop workstation (which is not slow).
To get that level of performance, from a battery that is half the size (and therefore half the weight) of most PC laptops, is pretty amazing. Combine the performance and light weight and integration with my desktop workstation all together… and I can be productive wherever I want. I don’t need to be at my desk all the time.
Finally there’s a lot of really nice software which is exclusive to the Mac. Raycast, for example.
And then there’s all the really nice little things - for example Macs do OCR on images. You can select text in a screenshot or company log and copy/paste it. Macs have a thousand nice small features like that.
I’m willing to pay a slight Docker performance penalty to enjoy all of these things and more. And if I wasn’t it’d be easy enough to run the docker containers on a Linux server in the small data center we have a few steps down the hall.
Not everybody is running containers, or is constrained by the performance of those containers, I guess?
I think the primary aspect where Macs are more appealing than Windows machines for many programmers is just that it’s a unixy machine and many of the tools that you’d care about from Linux / *BSDs / whatever are easily available. I guess this is maybe different in an era with WSL, but that’s a relatively new development, and since I’ve only used Macs and other unixy machines before I have no idea if that’s a viable option personally and I’d be skeptical…
In terms of “why a Mac over Linux?” I think it’s partially a matter of Macs being well supported and that most people don’t seem inclined to fiddle with Linux on their primary work computer.
Beyond that, though, I think MacBooks are just nice laptops with fewer compromises than most other laptops in my experience. They have good build quality and pretty much every aspect of them is pretty solid… Good keyboards, good chassis, good battery life, good screens, good trackpads, good speakers, good performance. I think it’s actually pretty hard to get something that’s as solid all around, I feel like with pretty much everything else there’s something that stands out to complain about. Like I love my Thinkpad, but god I wish I had an Apple trackpad, or an Apple silicon chip and the performance / watt that comes with it.
I’m a software engineer and have been one at T-Mobile, Comcast and various video game studios. Not a single person used Mac as an engineer. The closest we got was people using Linux because they were backend developers or operations. Mac users were always limited to account managers or non-technical executives. If you know a whole major corporation that uses Mac and it’s not Apple or Adobe, then I’d be very shocked.
I haven’t worked as an engineer since Windows 7
Does enterprise-class Windows 10/11 show ads as part of the desktop?
Too bad the Reddit migration attracted trolls like this.
You must not be talking about tech professionals, because the MBP is THE workstation in this field. Even developers at MSFT use them primarily.
The article says that the reason they don’t want the Mac Pro is, “because Apple’s other computers are just too good.”
I have friends in professional video production, and I think that’s incorrect
iOS doesn’t work with any of the software I use on a daily basis. Linux doesn’t either for that matter.
At least Linux has Wine. Also, I’m sure there is software out there for Linux users
I mean, Mac also has wine.
But the larger issue among the professionals I spoke to, and one that will likely take many more product cycles for Apple to truly fix, is one of trust. Apple, the business behemoth that it is, still has a reputation to build in the enterprise space. In order to become a go-to purchase for studios, Apple doesn’t just need to make the Mac Pro more competitive on price — it needs to reestablish itself as a brand that industries can rely on for years to come. And it needs to make some amends.
This, basically. Is it going to sell in huge numbers? No. But canceling it would be bad for the brand.
Developer/Devops here. I’ve been using MacBook pro going on probably 13 years now professionally. Being that Linux isn’t supported by the enterprise at work and the other option is windows, it’s really a no brainer.
I suspect they’re talking about the desktop computer
I mean, it’s just a really bad value compared to the rest of the lineup. It’s basically a Mac Studio in a larger case and a PCIe breakout board bolted on. That’s it. But for twice the price of the Mac Studio and 10 times it size.
The only unique features is has are PCIe and SATA ports. So unless you really need a ton of local storage or a ton of GPU-power, there’s no reason to buy it.
If you need a ton of local storage, it would be cheaper to buy a NAS and some 20TB drives for it than to upgrade from a Studio to a Mac Pro. Especially with a 10-gig Ethernet connection.
If I recall correctly, you cannot even put GPUs in there, right? Only other pci peripherals, or did this change?
Idiots with too much money.
It’s an absurd product. It’s a Mac Studio gingerly placed into a behemoth of a case that, itself, costs $3k, And for what? Can’t upgrade the memory or storage. Can’t add dGPUs. All you get is more ports and the ability to add internal PCI cards, both of which could be accomplished with the Studio with far cheaper external solutions. And it’s gigantic and weighs a ton.
Who is this for? Idiots?
Who is this for? Idiots?
Apple consumers. So, yes. The same people who pay $1,000 for a $10 monitor stand or $700 for a set of $10 wheels.
this isn’t a consumer-level product. it’s marketed at professionals and starts at $6k.
Believe it or not, professionals are also consumers.
not when you’re differentiating between “consumers” and “professionals” with regard to product classes, and in this context we’re discussing a product specifically targeted at professionals, not consumers.
if you want to play word games, this isn’t the place or time.
It’s definitely not targeting professionals. The “Pro” name is just marketing nonsense they slap on every product in their lineup.
everything in the marketing for the product is clearly targeted at creative professionals.
Yes, the marketing targets professionals. The products do not.
