• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s more like blackmail tbh. “Pay or i’ll track the shit out of you and sell the data to advertisers”. I can see why people are put off, and I am also. And what’s the guarantee if we pay that the data isn’t collected and sold anyway?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      That’s totally reasonable from the point of view of a developer who has to earn something to live. I mean you still have the choice to not use it. The internet simply works through user tracking and advertising

    • starlinguk
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I’ve seen a lot of websites do the same thing. Either allow cookies or pay

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        How’s it tinfoil hat? It’s very clear how much tracking is going on if you don’t subscribe. None of this stuff is made up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          I think he meant your last part. You say there is a chance that LJ will collect and sell data, although you paid for premium. That’s a unnecessary accusation.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We call that JAQing off and it’s never just a question.

              “They don’t answer me, conclusion is they do that thing I disagree with even if I don’t have proof of it.”

              Right out of the alt-right playbook but applied outside of politics.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  If the dev tells you “information gathering is deactivated for users who pay.” you won’t believe them, you’ll just move the goalpost and ask that they prove it by releasing their code, which they won’t do because their app isn’t open source and you’ll conclude that because they won’t prove it then we should just assume that they do.

                  That’s JAQing off and that’s exactly where you were heading with that first question. Guilty until proven innocent, but you don’t accuse directly, you’re Just Asking Questions.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    People have checked. The only data collection is for ads, and it doesn’t load the module at all if you have ads disabled.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -31 year ago

                    You’re really overthinking this buddy and making a lot of assumptions. And not to mention wasting your own damn time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          There’s a difference between “There’s a lot tracking happening if you don’t pay!” and “What’s the guarantee you don’t track us if we pay?” and that difference comes in the form of a hat… Made of tinfoil…