• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    You can take them as supplements. It’s the same for your body. Oh and you are already doing that, because they give supplements to the animals they raise and kill, we are just eliminating the middleman.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Cyanide occurs naturally. Water can be made in a lab by mixing Hydrogen and Oxygen and applying heat.

        Is Cyanide good for you when occurring naturally and water bad for you when artificially synthesized?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -61 year ago

          no. But it is also not the case that nature intended for us to consume artificially synthesized anything

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            161 year ago

            Natural is such a stupid argument. Is it natural for us to use a smartphone? Sit in a car and drive around? Work 8h a day instead of being with your peer group? Breed a fast growing special kind of animal, feed it with chemical ingredients and plants that don’t grow here only to eat them? Eat processed sugar? I think you get where I am going. Stop using this bullshit argument and take some supplements, your body will thank you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying that supplements are bad. What I am saying is that getting those things from their original source is not bad either. And no argument will get me to see it as such. You can have your supplements, it doesn’t affect me. But I will not feel guilty of doing what nature always intended me to do: i.e. eat stuff

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            nature intended

            Nature doesn’t intend anything, it simply is. We are, in the grand scheme of things, not separate from nature, and in this sense everything we do is natural. If you’re using “natural” to distinguish things from the results of human civilization, then eating animal products stemming from animal agriculture is just as “unnatural” as supplements, as both are products of civilization.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Worth noting that many non-vegans are vitamin deficient and some medical authorities, including the UK’s, even recommend that everyone take vitamin D supplements. Also, please reconsider using your Internet connection, that isn’t very natural either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -41 year ago

          as I said to the other guy, I’m not saying not natural is bad. But what op is implying is that getting the same stuff from natural sources is bad. That I just don’t agree with. It’s just the natural order of things. I have other options, yes, but I don’t consider the default natural source of things to be bad, so I don’t feel the need to switch. Animals eat animals all the time. And they don’t do it “humanely” either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Animals don’t have the options we do. That argument fails.

            Plus, that argument could be used to justify rape and murder. Perfectly natural. They don’t breed humanely.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                71 year ago

                Herbivores must, carnivores must not, omnivores with very high level thinking and moral agency is fortunate enough to choose.

                • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  So there isn’t the right nutrition available in plants to sustain every animal?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    31 year ago

                    Yes, I’m pretty sure a lion would die if he tried eating only plants, while I’d imagine a cow would die on a meat diet. I’m less well versed on non-human animal diets though, as I’ve never needed to give it a lot of thought.

                    I do know that humans can be very strong, fit and healthy on a plant-based diet, as confirmed by the world’s medical institutions, and demonstrated by vegan athletes of all types.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Why is it worse to get things from less natural sources? Ignoring that everybody get some of their vitamins from less natural sources, e.g. animals injected with B12, cereals fortified with iron, water and toothpaste with fluoride, synthesised morphines instead of smoking opium - would you say these things are bad too because they are less natural? And if so, why?

            Also, do you take all of your moral code from the worst things animals do? I hold myself to a higher standard and don’t eat my kids, rape, or fling shit at each others.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Well fantastic - best to go for the one with the least impact to the environment and suffering then!

                To make one redundant point, a nice thing about the less natural sourcing of things is that exact dosages can be measured during synethesis - so when tree bark is swapped out for aspirin, opium for morphine etc. you can get reliable, pure dosages for medicine. I don’t think that’s really very important for vitamins of course.